An independent customer initiative. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Sonic.

From San Francisco, with hope

We helped build
Sonic’s success.
Please don’t
leave us behind.

We’re longtime customers and neighbors. We believe in a different kind of internet company. We’re asking Sonic to keep believing in San Francisco, too.

Read our open letter

A little gratitude.
Two reasonable requests.

A letter worth opening.

Longtime customers. Still rooting for you.San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIAAN OPEN LETTER

Dear Sonic,

We love Sonic. We stand behind your mission. We want to see you thrive.

We’re longtime Sonic customers in San Francisco. We signed up, stayed, and told our neighbors about you.

For some of us, that support began when the Sonic service available to us was resold AT&T service. We paid more than we would have by going to AT&T directly. We did it because we believed in you and wanted to support what you were building.

Month after month, our bills helped support the company you’ve become. We’re proud to have been part of that story.

That’s why this is difficult to write. After years of hearing that changes are coming, we fear your older 1Gig customers have been forgotten. We wouldn’t have taken the time to come together and build this website if we didn’t care about you and your future.

Years of waiting, in Sonic’s own words

These are dated posts from Sonic leadership and staff, not just customer speculation. They describe plans and progress, with important qualifications.

  1. Unbundling was being considered.

    Dane Jasper said Sonic would continue considering unbundling and might test it in other markets, while explicitly saying there were no near-term changes planned for its core products.

    Read Dane’s post ↗
  2. Upgrades for existing areas were planned.

    Announcing a 10Gig deployment, Dane wrote that “upgrades will be available in existing areas in the future.” He also identified equipment supply, software, process, and cost issues to resolve.

    Read Dane’s post ↗
  3. Northeast San Francisco was named.

    Dane described parts of Northeast San Francisco and Oakland as the first areas expected to see upgrades, where compatible central-office equipment was already deployed. He explained that customer equipment and other work remained.

    Read Dane’s post ↗
  4. A system upgrade path; physical work still ahead.

    Spencer W., a Sonic Community and Escalations Specialist, said an upgrade path had been completed in Sonic’s systems, but existing 1Gig areas still needed physical infrastructure upgrades. He could not give an estimated date.

    Read Spencer’s update ↗
  5. A no-voice 1Gig option was an explicit goal.

    In the same thread, following questions from San Francisco customers, Max from Sonic’s Customer Care Development Team said 1Gig-to-10Gig upgrades were progressing slowly and described a goal of offering Standard 1G without voice. He had no timeline to share.

    Read Max’s update ↗

These posts do not promise a citywide completion date or establish that no customers have been upgraded. Our request is for a clear, current plan for the households still waiting.

But for those of us still on older 1Gig Fusion service, loyalty is starting to feel like a disadvantage. We’re paying for a mandatory phone bundle we may not use, carrying its taxes and fees, and waiting for a clear path to 10Gbps.

Many of us have pressed “Request Upgrade” again and again, without receiving a status update or a clear indication of where our request stands. We want to know that you have heard us, what work remains, and when we can expect another update.

We appreciate the visibility you give new neighborhood builds and new city expansions. Existing 1Gig customers need that same transparency. Staff have acknowledged upgrade plans in the forums, but we still lack a comparable public progress dashboard, neighborhood timeline, or regular updates we can plan around. Between occasional replies that there is no timeline to share, it can feel like complete silence. Please show us where these upgrades stand and what happens next.

Your website promises “no confusing bundles” and the “lowest price possible.” We struggle to square that promise with a mandatory Fusion phone bundle and a bill listing phone service at $0 while adding $20.04 in voice-related taxes and fees. Please explain how that promise applies to the 1Gig customers who still cannot choose internet-only service. Read Sonic’s published offer ↗

This matters for hardworking San Franciscans: retired public servants, students, working people, and low-income families for whom every dollar counts. For a household where Sonic is the only practical internet option, switching providers may not be an answer. A family may not even own a landline handset, yet still have to pay the charges associated with a phone service it never uses.

The bill below adds up to $240.48 a year in voice-related taxes and fees, if those charges stay the same. That is money out of a household’s pocket before counting the voice portion already included in the bundle. Making people carry that cost for unwanted service feels at odds with the mission that made us choose Sonic.

Meanwhile, the competition has moved on. For customers offered AT&T’s 5Gbps service for $50 a month with a five-year price lock, staying on Sonic’s older 1Gig service—with a bundled phone and a higher total bill—is a harder choice to justify. AT&T doesn’t require a home-phone bundle for that internet offer.

The AT&T offer above was confirmed by a campaign organizer. Availability, eligibility, discounts, taxes, and price-lock terms depend on the offer and address; it is not a universal advertised rate. Check AT&T’s terms and availability ↗

Even Xfinity is investing in its network, with symmetrical download and upload speeds available in parts of San Francisco and faster-than-1Gig download plans in eligible areas. Its advertised 1Gig offer is $60 a month with a five-year price guarantee, without a required home-phone bundle or its associated voice taxes and fees. That advertised internet price is less than the $80.03 total on the example Sonic bill below. Other providers are continuing to invest and compete for our business. What will Sonic offer its existing customers in return?

Xfinity staff: symmetrical service in parts of San Francisco ↗ · Comcast’s network upgrades ↗ · Xfinity’s advertised offer and terms ↗. The $60 offer was listed when reviewed November 4, 2026; it requires new-customer eligibility, bank-account autopay, and paperless billing. Availability and upload speeds vary by address; 1Gig download does not imply symmetrical service. Taxes and other fees may be extra and may change during the price guarantee.

At the same time, you’re expanding far beyond the Bay Area into Los Angeles and Dallas. Your own announcement offers those markets speeds up to 10Gbps starting at $40 a month. Your internet-only Standard Fiber option doesn’t require the phone bundle or its voice-related charges. It is difficult to watch new markets get a faster, simpler offer while we pay $59.99 for a 1Gig bundle before those additional taxes and fees.

Our neighbors are waiting, too. Some live right next to streets with Sonic service in San Francisco and would love to get Sonic fiber, yet still cannot order it at home. Watching you enter entirely new cities while those gaps remain makes us worry that San Francisco is being left behind. Please upgrade the customers already here and make a clear plan to connect the neighbors still waiting.

Sonic’s Los Angeles and Dallas expansion announcement ↗ · Published Los Angeles pricing ↗. Availability, equipment options, and terms vary by address.

We understand that network upgrades take time, planning, and investment. We also believe the customers who helped make that investment possible deserve a place at the front of the line.

Please email existing customers about the benefits of 10Gig and the internet-only Standard Fiber option. Explain that this option does not require phone service or its voice-related taxes and fees. Show the full monthly price, any equipment or upgrade costs, and how it compares with our current bundle. Include a direct link to request an upgrade, explain who is eligible, and give us a way to check the status afterward. Asking for an upgrade should begin a conversation, not leave us waiting in silence.

Two changes. A fairer future.

01

Make phone service optional.

End mandatory phone bundling for existing internet customers. Let us remove the phone service and the taxes, surcharges, and fees associated with it. Give us transparent, competitive internet-only pricing.

02

Upgrade existing customers first.

Prioritize 10Gbps upgrades for existing customers before expanding service to new neighborhoods. Publish a progress dashboard and a clear neighborhood upgrade timeline, explain any costs, and keep us informed. Email customers about their options, acknowledge upgrade requests, and provide status updates.

We want more San Franciscans to have the best internet in the U.S. We also want growth to include the people already here. Expansion should build on the trust of existing customers.

We’re asking for a public response, a concrete plan, and a reason to keep recommending you. We want Sonic to succeed. We want to be part of that success. Please show us that the customers who have been here for years still matter.

We helped build Sonic’s success.
Please don’t leave us behind.

Your longtime customers

San Francisco, California

Independent. Customer-led. Hopeful.Share the letter

02 / What loyalty costs

The phone is $0.
The fees aren’t.

A customer’s 1Gig Fusion bill, using the regular $59.99 bundle price after the temporary promotional discount ends.

The phone service appears as a $0 line item. Its voice-related taxes and fees still add $20.04 every month.

$240.48in voice-related taxes & fees over 12 months
if these charges stay the same

A supplied customer bill, with identifying details removed. This is one bill, not a quote for every customer. Charges and rates can change.

A CLOSER LOOKMONTHLY / USD

1Gig Fusion, item by item.

Every charge has a story. Tap a line item to understand it.

Sanitized monthly bill at the regular service price
The service
Fiber — Fusion 1Gbps
Service price set by Sonic

The regular $59.99 bundled service price supplied for this example, after its promotional discount ends. This is a commercial plan price, not a government tax. The supplied bill allocates $49.99 to data and $10 to voice; that allocation is already inside this $59.99. It does not make voice an optional add-on on this older plan.

Sonic’s explanation of Fusion ↗

$59.99
Fiber Phone Service
Included in the bundle; not free of fees

This $0 line does not mean there is no voice component in the package. The supplied bill allocates $10 of the bundled service price to voice. The separate voice-related taxes and fees listed below add another $20.04. We are asking to be able to remove the voice service and its associated charges, rather than simply hiding that component inside a bundle.

Sonic Fiber FAQ ↗

$0.00
Bundle allocation: data $49.99 + voice $10.00. Already included in the $59.99 above; no additional charge.
Government taxes & assessments $6.07
California 911 Emergency Surcharge
Government-required collection

California requires suppliers to collect this surcharge on non-exempt voice access lines, including VoIP. It supports the state’s emergency communications system. The published 2026 rate is $0.41 per access line per month. It is connected to the provision of a voice line, not to whether a customer owns a handset or makes calls. Exemptions can apply.

CDTFA: who must collect it ↗ · 2026 rates ↗

$0.41
San Francisco, CA Access Line Fee
Local government tax

San Francisco imposes an Access Line Tax on telephone subscribers, subject to exceptions. Its definition includes assigned telephone numbers used for VoIP service. Providers generally collect it from users. The $4.36 is the amount on the supplied bill, not a statement of the current rate for every line; city rates and classifications can change. This is a city tax associated with voice service, not a Sonic-created profit surcharge.

San Francisco Treasurer: Access Line Tax ↗

$4.36
California Public Utility Commission User Fee
Government assessment on the provider

The CPUC assesses telephone corporations, including interconnected VoIP providers, to fund its operations, based on intrastate revenue. That establishes the provider’s obligation. The source reviewed does not by itself establish that this exact $0.20 customer line item is mandatory. We distinguish a required carrier payment from a requirement to bill a particular amount separately to the customer. Sonic should explain the calculation and the basis for passing it through.

CPUC: User Fee ↗

$0.20
California 988 Suicide Prevention Surcharge
Government-required collection

California requires collection of this surcharge on non-exempt voice access lines, including VoIP. It supports the 988 crisis-response system. The published 2026 rate is $0.05 per line per month. It is separate from the 911 surcharge. A customer does not have to make a call to incur a surcharge on a provisioned, non-exempt line.

CDTFA: collection requirements ↗ · 2026 rates ↗

$0.05
California Public Purpose Program Surcharge
Government-required collection

California requires telephone providers, including VoIP providers, to collect this surcharge from non-exempt subscribers. It funds six public-purpose programs, including LifeLine, connectivity for schools and libraries, and access for people with disabilities. The state moved from six separate surcharges to one per-access-line charge in 2023. The $1.05 shown is from the supplied bill; exemptions and rate changes matter.

CPUC: consumer explanation ↗ · CPUC: collection instructions ↗

$1.05
Sonic charges & cost recovery $13.97
Federal Subscriber Line Charge Fee
Provider charge; not a federal tax

The name can sound like a government fee, but this is a provider charge traditionally associated with recovering local telephone-network access costs. The Minnesota Attorney General explains that the FCC allows, but does not require, local phone companies to bill it. The FCC also distinguishes voluntary carrier line items from government-mandated charges. That does not prove Sonic’s VoIP fee is unlawful, a “loophole,” or pure profit. We have not verified those claims. Sonic should identify the contractual or tariff basis for this $6.50 and explain its application to fiber/VoIP service.

Official consumer guide ↗ · FCC: distinction between charges ↗

$6.50
Federal Universal Service Fund Fee
Carrier contribution required; pass-through is a choice

Eligible telecommunications carriers and interconnected VoIP providers must contribute to the federal Universal Service Fund. USAC, the fund’s administrator, expressly says the FCC does not require carriers to pass those contributions through as a charge on customers’ bills. A provider that does so must follow the relevant calculation rules. It funds a real public program; that is different from saying this particular customer line item is federally mandated.

USAC: how universal service is funded ↗ · FCC rule on recovery ↗

$3.71
FCC Interstate Telecom Service Provider Fee
Provider cost recovery; not a direct FCC bill

The FCC assesses regulatory fees on covered providers to fund regulatory activities. That provider obligation does not, by itself, require a separately itemized $0.05 charge to each customer. Sonic lists this item as recovery of regulatory fees. We have not independently audited Sonic’s cost allocation or established a law requiring this exact customer charge. It belongs with provider charges and cost recovery, not with direct consumer taxes.

Sonic: explanation of this item ↗ · FCC: regulatory cost-recovery line items ↗

$0.05
Property Tax Allotment Surcharge
Sonic cost-recovery charge

Sonic describes this as a way to recover property taxes on telecommunications equipment, not as a tax imposed directly on the customer. A tax liability of the company and a requirement to add a particular surcharge to your bill are different things. Sonic’s description supports treating this as provider cost recovery; it does not establish that the entire amount is profit.

Sonic’s own explanation ↗

$1.69
Regulatory Recovery Surcharge
Sonic charge; not government-mandated

Sonic says this recovers regulatory-compliance and related costs, and explicitly states that it is not a tax the government requires Sonic to collect from customers. It is a provider-imposed charge. That supports asking Sonic to explain or remove it; it does not establish that no underlying costs exist or that the whole amount is profit.

Sonic’s own explanation ↗

$2.02
Actual monthly total
The arithmetic, without double counting

Regular bundled service: $59.99. Government taxes and assessments shown: $6.07. Provider charges and cost recovery shown: $13.97. Together: $80.03. The extra $20.04 becomes $240.48 over 12 months if unchanged. The $10 voice allocation inside the bundle is not added again, and the temporary promotional discount is excluded.

$80.03

Open any line item to see what it funds and whether collection from the customer is required. The first group includes a government assessment on the provider; its separate customer pass-through is not established as mandatory. The second includes provider charges and cost recovery, not necessarily profit. Amounts are from the supplied bill, not a validation of every current rate. See the sources ↓

03 / From one neighbor to another

A city worth
staying connected to.

Show Sonic that the people behind these addresses care. Add one +1 for your home, and help make our shared voice visible.

—Total +1s contributedLoading the community total…

SAN FRANCISCO / COMMUNITY SUPPORT
Community support across San FranciscoNeighborhood areas show support in ranges. Areas with fewer than five entries are not published. Select a neighborhood to read its status.PACIFIC OCEANSAN FRANCISCO BAYBayview Hunters PointBernal HeightsCastro/Upper MarketChinatownExcelsiorFinancial District/South BeachGlen ParkGolden Gate ParkHaight AshburyHayes ValleyInner RichmondInner SunsetJapantownLakeshoreLincoln ParkLone Mountain/USFMarinaMcLaren ParkMissionMission BayNob HillNoe ValleyNorth BeachOceanview/Merced/InglesideOuter MissionOuter RichmondPacific HeightsPortolaPotrero HillPresidioPresidio HeightsRussian HillSeacliffSouth of MarketSunset/ParksideTenderloinTreasure IslandTwin PeaksVisitacion ValleyWest of Twin PeaksWestern Addition

Select a neighborhood to explore.

Not published* 5–9 10–24 25–49 50–99 100+

*No activity or fewer than 5 supporting addresses in the selected group. Street detail uses the same threshold per street segment. Ranges update daily; individual homes are never pinned. Areas use DataSF analysis neighborhoods, a reference geography rather than official neighborhood boundaries.

A small act. A shared voice.

One home. One +1.

No name. No email. One +1 for your San Francisco home. Existing customers ask for an upgrade; waiting neighbors ask for service.

Checking availability…

Add your support

Start with your house number, then choose a San Francisco address.

How the address check works

We check the incoming network, then match your address and unit against San Francisco’s public address reference. Address suggestions search that same reference on our server; typed queries are not stored by the application or sent to a third-party address service. Sonic connections go into the existing-customer group; other connections go into the waiting-for-service group. A VPN or mobile network may place an existing customer in the wrong group. Visit from your Sonic home connection to support the existing-customer request. The application stores a secret-keyed address fingerprint, support group, neighborhood, public street-segment identifier, and submission day. It does not save your IP or submitted address in the support records.

The exact citywide +1 total combines both groups and updates immediately after a successful submission. Neighborhood and street-segment activity is published only in ranges, starting at five addresses per group, after a daily delay. The check does not independently prove address ownership or an active customer account. New and repeat submissions receive the same response so the form is not a public list of participating homes.

Cloudflare handles hosting and bot protection and may process connection data under its own policies. Campaign records are kept while the campaign is active. No separate signup or mailing list is created.

Whether you have Sonic or are still waiting, this letter is for you. Share it with your neighbors.

04 / A few fair questions

Let’s be clear.

Respect for the company.
A fair deal for its customers.

Is this a Sonic website?

No. Dear Sonic is an independent initiative by longtime customers in San Francisco. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Sonic. Sonic is a trademark of its respective owner. This site does not provide account support.

What exactly are you asking for?

Two changes: make phone service optional and remove its associated taxes and fees for customers who opt out; prioritize 10Gbps upgrades for existing customers before expanding into new neighborhoods, with a public timeline and transparent costs.

Are all of these fees required by the government?

No. Some are government taxes or surcharges. Others are provider charges or the recovery of provider costs. For example, Sonic describes its property-tax allotment and regulatory-recovery charges as cost recovery. USAC explains that carriers choose whether to pass federal universal-service contributions through to customers. We’re asking to make the phone service optional, so customers who don’t want it can avoid its associated charges. Read the sources.

Does every Sonic customer have this problem?

No. This letter focuses on customers on older bundled plans who still face these issues. Sonic already offers internet-only 10Gbps Standard Fiber in eligible areas. Plans, upgrade options, and fees vary by address and account. Check your own bill and ask Sonic about your eligibility.

Why bring up AT&T and Xfinity?

Because customers have to weigh the alternatives available at their address. The AT&T offer in the letter was confirmed by an organizer. Xfinity publicly advertises 1Gig for $60 a month with a five-year price guarantee for eligible new customers, without a mandatory home-phone bundle. Offers, speeds, and terms vary; see the linked qualifications in the letter. Older 1Gig Sonic areas need a competitive offer and a clear upgrade path. We have no affiliation with either provider and receive no referral payments.

Are you against Sonic expanding?

No. We want more people to have a good alternative. Our request is about priorities: upgrade existing customers first, and communicate a concrete plan so growth also serves the people who supported it.

The context behind the letter

Our requests are ours. For service policies and fee explanations, read the original sources. Last reviewed November 4, 2026. The community map shows support, not Sonic service availability or a survey of all customers.